After last weeks tutorial, I was left slightly deflated. The process I had been living by and envisioning for my FMP, all seemed to make sense in my mind, but once I had to vocalise this process... It all went downhill from there. I only needed to look at the facial expressions around me and the sound of silence. A clear indicator I needed to reorganise my ideas.
My concept of contradicting and disrupting specific areas of London didn't seem to be understood. I tried to explain every ounce of my process. From this I learned, I had to thoroughly prepare for the tutorials, but first and foremost, pick out the key turning points, changes, new thoughts that have concretely shaped my (work in progress) final outcome.
If my blog has been misunderstood so far, below I have attempted to summarise the key points/subjects in my FMP presently:
_____________________________________________________________________
So far…
- Chiaroscuro
-
Baroque art
-
English baroque architecture (identifying
chiaroscuro)
Urban book 'Transforming Cities' (ephemeral
structures) & London DVD
-
Revising through proposal, revisiting
gentrification (thames), tutorial – where on the thames?
-
Thames maps (history, to help with the function),
chose location from the lectures,
-
Crit started to think of a series that tied the
ideas of contradiction –
-
visited the location, was drawn to the alien
atmosphere in the centre (middle dock)
- Materials Lab
- Squares
- Materials Lab
- Squares
-
Netherlands (market) squares - paid slightly
more attention to this in Holland
-
Starting designing contradictions (baroque in
dock), remember baroque is to show off, glorify. Bringing back the history of
the map, use it in baroque context. Glorify a market! – Designing started
-
Designs of market in the middle dock
- Model
- Model
simplifying series
Getting to understand what my final piece will potentially be has taken a lengthy process. I had concrete research at the beginning (Baroque locations), and after this as I went onto research into the history of my location and looked at maps. I diverted into many turns including: London DVD and the 'Transforming Cities' book. Although this was slightly off topic, it still shaped how I got to where I am now.
A few quotes from the documentary 'London', which have acted as a baseline towards my project:
'Sometimes I see the whole city as a monument (to Rimbaud)'
'The life here, like the air here, is bad for the weak, for the frail, for one who seeks props outside himself, for one who seeks welcome sympathy, attention.'
'The masses are saved by battling for their daily bread, the commercial classes by their absorption is heaping up wealth and all, by the bustle of business.'
_____________________________________________________________________________
A few quotes from the documentary 'London', which have acted as a baseline towards my project:
'Sometimes I see the whole city as a monument (to Rimbaud)'
'The life here, like the air here, is bad for the weak, for the frail, for one who seeks props outside himself, for one who seeks welcome sympathy, attention.'
'The masses are saved by battling for their daily bread, the commercial classes by their absorption is heaping up wealth and all, by the bustle of business.'
_____________________________________________________________________________
My trip to the Netherlands, I believe has allowed me to simplify potential ideas for the final piece. Rotterdam seemed to have this effect, as many of the buildings and structures' functions were to confusing to the viewer. The buildings and spaces weren’t abstract, but they were playful and simple structures. I realised that I had previously tried to over complicate my initial concept, and diverted off my concept to some extent. It was still relating to the urban location, just slightly off the topic of gentrification. I mentioned gentrification in my proposal, wanting to show the effects of this process in the space/structure. For example, representing the statistics in the shape and form of the building. Looking at my current work, I haven’t seemed to show this in my designs, but a minute aspect of gentrification is still seen in my work. The location of my structure being close to the River Thames relates to gentrification by the River Thames, which is what I had researched in my first project.
_______________________________________________________________________
Revisiting data and continuing with designs
So I converted these trends, the foundation to one's life, into the shapes of the floating concrete path I would use in the middle dock to connect the market stall to the dock edge. In this sense, the concrete pathway would be a symbol the fluctuation of employment and house prices, the base support to one's life, which in essence is what bridges and paths are for.
_______________________________________________________________________
Revisiting data and continuing with designs
The roofs of this design were initially taking on the form of an elongated dome from Wren's domes at Old Royal Navy College. Although, as I continued to sketch, the shape took not he influences of the curved shape of the Markthal. The two structures would be identical, with a concrete bridge joining the two structures together. In green, I included a lift in the design, but as I went to research if constructing a lift on water was possible, I found that it was not achievable. However, stairs were possible but a minimum height for the building would need to be in place.
The path would be formed from a concrete flume. I found this piece of engineering when researching if concrete could float on water. Architects Cumulus Studio used a concrete flume to create a 250m concrete pier.
Concrete Flume |
After not having great successes with my maps at the British Library, I went on to find some books on the subject of gentrification or regeneration around the Docklands. Gentrification usually causes an increase in house prices as well as employment, this was evident in the London Docklands in the 1960's and 90's when it was being redeveloped. Taking note of these statistics, I converted them into graphs just for the visual pattern.
This research had lingered in my book and I was unsure on whether to use the information or not. Although after starting to reflect on the concrete flume, which is just a straight path, I questioned 'what does the pier provide to a human?'. Support. Safety. Stability. These characteristics are also traits of what a job and home gives. In this present day a job and shelter are considered to be the infrastructure to one's life.
From here, I began working out what construction methods would need to be used for large floating structures. Using concrete piles appeared to be the most efficient option. The spacing of the piles would be double the diameter of the pile. The piles I would be using would be 700mm in diameter, as this is a standard diameter for concrete piles. This worked well as the middle dock's water depth is 8500mm.
I used the BGS borehole finder to find out the depth of the geology of the middle dock, which allowed me to determine what piles I would use.
I believed that drilling holes into the ground would be an issue, but after having seen the borehole map, I found that holes are actually constantly being driven into the ground.
At this point, I was slightly held back because I researched too much into the engineering aspect of the structure. Since the structure would need piles, in order to work out how many pile were needed, I had to find out the volume and density of the structure. I then used a website that had a 'concrete calculator', from this I could get a rough idea of the approximate weight. This ended up being slightly too complicated, and so I spoke to my peers about this dilemma and found a solution. This would be to use the standard piles used for standard floating structures.
The system I would use for the bridge would be a standard floating decking system and flotation blocks. This is one of the easiest construction methods for structures that stay afloat on shallow water.
Focusing on the roof design, which resulted in a viewing platform/gallery.
Experimenting with the shapes of the overall floor, my sketches led me onto repetitively drawing each floor multiple times, with each floor decreasing in size because on the ground floor, I want the focus to be on the market stalls.
I also began to open up the shape of the alcoves I created before, to experiment with different forms.
Expanding from my further designs
I did not take these forms any further in my designs, as I felt it became too abstract for my concept.
Sketchup
To speed up the process, I transferred my designs onto sketchup. Whilst creating the forms on the software, I did multiple variations of the forms I was going to use. I had to do this because I felt having one set design would not allow me to explore different routes into evolving my design into something more meaningful.
Once I added my vague structure to the location, it becomes evident that I would not be able to have the location in the final model because the floating structure would appear as a small dot in comparison to Canary Wharf, if it was on a scale of 1:100.
Middle Dock illustrator file, no longer of use due to scaling issues |